> -----Original Message----- > From: John Levine [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 9:40 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-09.txt > > Section 10 tells people to use SHA1 as a redaction hash. The crypto > weenies who freaked out last time will do so again. Suggest you > replace the text in the section with whatever we said last time, just > do something that's hard to reverse.
There is no Section 10 in this document. Which one are you looking at? > I have to say that I'm not thrilled that sections 3, 4, and 5 still > include the r= remote mailbombing feature. The algorithm in the draft is the one you've been suggesting, for the most part. "r=" is now simply a Boolean indicator of a request for reports, and the rest of the reporting parameters are drawn from DNS records. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
