> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Shmuel Metz > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 7:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] meaning of signatures, was I-D Action: > draft-ietf-marf-as-07.txt > > We're still talking at cross purposes. I'm talking about the posibility > of the sender providing a field that contains text encrypted with a > private key and the receiver attempting to decrypt it using a public > key. I'm not addressing the issue of associating the sender with an > organization, just with his right to use the domain in the header.
I believe this is off-topic for MARF. Please don't reply to this thread unless you have an argument to make that it's germane to one of the documents under development. -MSK, as co-chair _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
