In <f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>, on 02/14/2012 at 09:26 AM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>I believe this is off-topic for MARF. Please don't reply to this >thread unless you have an argument to make that it's germane to one >of the documents under development. The context for this is that I wanted the language to be general rather than limited to specific protocols. From Message-Id: <[email protected]> "I'd rather make it more general and also require authentication for anything not based on the source IP or a domain resolving to the source id." The intent is that the AS not automatically become obsolete should the IETF ever publish a new authentication protocol. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
