In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 02/14/2012
at 11:14 AM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>So do we need to say "Updates RFC5965" in Scott's draft, perhaps
>pointing at the erratum in an appendix or something, just to tie it
>all together?
That's my take. Also, is failure to respond to an erratum taken as
concurrence or non-concurrence?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
