> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Shmuel Metz > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Message bodies in ARF reports > > That's my take. Also, is failure to respond to an erratum taken as > concurrence or non-concurrence?
I think only a verified erratum has any effect, although the effect only matters if one knows to go looking for it. The real way to get the erratum implemented is a -bis effort, but I'm not sure that would be wise for RFC5965 just now. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
