> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Reorganizing the AS > > > I'd endorse adding such language for messages that are authenticated > > by DKIM or SPF, but I believe that the general statement is still > > needed for other messages. > > I don't think it's possible for this applicability statement to cover > arbitrary authentication technologies. I think it can only address the > ones we have. I don't mind if we make the references to the DKIM and > SPF drafts exemplary, but that doesn't mean arbitrary things will work.
I prefer this approach as well. Do you have specific text to suggest (or point me to earlier in this thread)? -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
