In <[email protected]>, on 04/04/2012
at 09:27 PM, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said:
>Is there a better way to convey that?
Perhaps split it into what the MUA should do if the MSA provides for
ARF collection and what the MUA should do if it is on its own. I'd
like to say that the MUA MUST take advantage of centralized ARF
processing if available, but don't see how to square that with RFC
2119, "6. Guidance in the use of these Imperatives".
BTW, that issue applies to some of the other MUST language; in most
cases, we haven't shown that "it is actually required for
interoperation or to limit behavior which (sic) has potential for
causing harm (e.g., limiting retransmisssions)".
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
