On Fri 06/Apr/2012 17:54:51 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> From: ietf.org On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely >> >>> Actually changing "report generator" to "Feedback Provider" is a >>> better idea because it makes the two documents even more consistent >>> with each other. So I'll do that as well. >> >> Do you mean to extend Feedback Provider to also cover auth failures? > > Sure. Although the process in that case is automated, the > definition still applies.
In that case, I see no contraindication. Please go ahead. You may want to import RFC 6449's "Glossary of Standard Terms", instead of (or in addition to) redefining Mailbox Provider. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
