>> Yes, 2. But an AS doesn't necessarily (perhaps usually doesn't) cover >> every use case. Consider the greylisting document that's also on this >> week's telechat: it's describing how to use SMTP for a specific use >> case, to do a specific thing. Many AS documents will be of that >> nature, talking about certain use cases, but not every possible one. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting/ is > different, as its scope is well defined, starting with the title: "Email > Greylisting: An Applicability Statement for SMTP" > On the other hand, "Creation and Use of Email Feedback Reports: An > Applicability Statement for the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF)" points to a > generic ARF application statement... which is not.
Hm. This doesn't cover all use cases for ARF any more than greylisting covers all use cases for SMTP, so I don't see the point. But I'll leave it to Murray to respond further on this. Maybe he has some other thoughts.[1] Barry [1] Well, of course, he does... but I mean thoughts related to this point. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
