Kristian Nielsen <kniel...@knielsen-hq.org> writes:

> I think there are two issues here.
>
> One is that we are replacing InnoDB with XtraDB in MariaDB. Thus we need
> XtraDB to build and work on all the platforms that MariaDB should work on.
>
> The other is to get good performance/scalability of XtraDB. This is very
> important on the major platforms, but maybe not on all platforms.
>
> So it seems that right now XtraDB relies on GCC intrinsics for the performance
> improvements. I personally think this is fine. We can build with GCC on the
> main performance platforms I think. The main non-GCC platform currently is
> Windows, so we need XtraDB to build and work with non-GCC, but I think for now
> 8CPU+ scalability on Windows is not the most important priority.
>
> Later we can then add Windows method for scalability, or maybe switch to also
> build with GCC on Windows.
>
>> I am not sure what to do with this, I also need to look into
>> InnoDB-plugin 1.0.3, what solution they have and may be use new InnoDB
>> rw_locks instead of ours. Anyway - this is something to discuss.
>
> Ok.
>
> I will also look closer as time permits, checking the ./configure tests
> (already discussed this a bit with Sergei Golubchik) and the build failures
> when INNODB_RW_LOCKS_USE_ATOMICS is not defined.

Just to avoid duplicate work, let me just mention that I am now starting to
look into this issue. I will try to find a good way to make XtraDB
compile/work on all the platforms/compilers we want to support, and report
back what I discover.

 - Kristian.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to     : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to