On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:41 -0800, david parsons wrote:
> I'm fairly late to the game (and I wrote a C markdown before I
> started reading this list, so I'm not exactly in the mainstream) but
> the syntax described on humanized seems incredibly noisy. Wouldn't
> the editorial corrections markup fit better as a footnote?
>
> I'd think that something like [text](ed: change -- why), like so:
>
> They called to say that [they're](ed: was `their` -- be
> careful with "their" and "they're") coming over in
> [a](ed: was `an` -- `an` is only before a vowel) quarter-hour.
>
> might be a little more readable than the thicket of []'s that
> Mr. Raskin proposed.
I like this variation:
They called to say that the{-ir}{+y're}{be careful with "their" and
"they're"} coming over in a{-n}{`an` is only before a vowel}
quarter-hour.
Also for author names and dates: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-04}
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
