PS: And not to forget: even if we keep today's situation, people can use Markdown-extensions to use footnotes, tables, etc. And then people who don't know these extensions are in the same situation like it was part of classic markdown. It's only about having one single, universal syntax-standard for Markdown (including the advanced things like tables, footnotes, etc.) and not many different standards that are confusing to (new) users. _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Alan J . Hogan
- Re: Universal syntax for M... David Chambers
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Waylan Limberg
- Re: Universal syntax for M... David Chambers
- Re: Universal syntax for M... John MacFarlane
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Seumas Mac Uilleachan
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Fletcher T. Penney
- Re: Universal syntax for Markd... Florian Sperlich
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Michel Fortin
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Florian Sperlich
- Re: Universal syntax for M... Florian Sperlich
- Re: Universal syntax for Markdown Sam Angove
- Re: Universal syntax for Markdown Sherwood Botsford
- Re: Universal syntax for Markdown John MacFarlane
- Re: Universal syntax for Markdown Christoph Freitag
- Metadata syntax (was Universal syntax for Markd... Fletcher T. Penney
- Re: Metadata syntax (was Universal syntax f... Sam Angove
- Re: Metadata syntax (was Universal synt... Alan J. Hogan
- Re: Metadata syntax (was Universal synt... John MacFarlane
- re: Universal syntax for Markdown Bowerbird
- Re: Universal syntax for Markdown Fletcher T. Penney