+++ Sam Angove [Aug 16 11 16:26 ]: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Florian Sperlich > <flo.sperl...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > And this universal syntax should have the additions of MultiMarkdown: > > footnotes, tables, definition lists, citation, metadata (author, > > title, date), and so on... Because I think many people would like to > > have these additional functions in Markdown. And who doesn't need > > these additional functions, simply doesn't use them. > > Not to be a party pooper, but I really think it would be a good idea > to try and fix the ambiguities and problems in the core syntax (and > implementations thereof) before trying to find common ground between > the legions of hideously ugly and frequently incompatible extensions. > > To get things started, here's a test case that most of the > implementations on babelmark fail: > > http://babelmark.bobtfish.net/?markdown=*+*+&normalize=on&src=1&dest=2
Maybe it would be better to put the point this way: here's a case where it's just not clear what counts as failing. And that's just the problem. John _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
