Le 2012-06-23 à 10:18, Jakob a écrit :
>> Not at all. If we want to allow anything inside a figure element (as HTML5
>> permits), then all we have to do is force the figure content to be
>> indented. You could even nest figures that way.
>
> *That's maybe even better!* So the syntax would be just the inversion of my
> proposal: Instead of figure => caption you have caption => figure. This makes
> a lot more sense.
>
> However, would we still be able to have multi-paragraph captions?
That would require a syntax with a recurring prefix. For instance, we could
mimic how blockquotes work and use "]" as a prefix for captions:
] Figure 1: some big figure caption
]
] second paragraph of the caption
]
] > blockquote in the caption
]
] etc.
! Here goes the figure's content
Indented by one tab
But I fear this is complicating the syntax too much for something that is
rarely needed. There's always HTML as a fallback if you really need this.
>> Now, just make the leading "!" and indentation optional for an image and
>> you get this:
>>
>> [[ Figure 1: A simple image ]]
>> 
>
> The only problem with this would be that *every* image would get a figure.
> However i think `! ` would do the job
> just fine: so only the indent would be optional.
What I was proposing is that an image alone on its line and preceded by a
caption would become a figure. Not every standalone images.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
