Thank you for the quick response. Kim
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:11 AM, "Chip Childers" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:55:55AM -0500, Shane Curcuru wrote: >> Please see our FAQ for software product names using Apache brands: >> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#poweredby >> >> Note that alternate separator phrases besides "Powered By" are >> acceptable when the meaning of the phrase (or word) is clear from >> the context of the specific relationship between a third party's >> software product and the Apache product. >> >> I'm not familiar with the CloudStack plugin model, but if Chip and >> the CloudStack PMC are happy with the name in terms of how "for" >> clearly fits within how plugins are developed and used, then it's >> fine with me. > > "for" seems like a very reasonable separator to me. I'm +1 on this. > >> >> Note: as Chip notes, the use of the full "Apache CloudStack" name is >> required. >> >> - Shane Curcuru >> VP, Brand Management >> The Apache Software Foundation
