On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:47:35PM +0000, Giles Sirett wrote: > Maybe more maddening for us, but at least the end "customer" would get one > answer and one point of contact. > > In these more complex examples, theres nothing to stop us using the existing > approach (as an exception)
Perhaps this simple patch, with a process of discussing on private@ only, and then responding when we achieve consensus, would work? Index: trademark-guidelines.mdtext =================================================================== --- trademark-guidelines.mdtext(revision 1601368) +++ trademark-guidelines.mdtext(working copy) @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ ## Non-software goods * Without explicit written permission, goods bearing any of the * CloudStack marks may not be sold. -* Designs for non-software goods require both PMC approval and approval from [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]). +* Designs for non-software goods require both PMC approval (via [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])) and approval from [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]). ## Websites
