whoa! CloudStack is really not in a bad shape considering the size of our community and marketing budget.
Thanks Ilya! On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Ilya. > > I agree that ACS is doing well considering the relative lack of > contribution compared to OpenStack. CloudStack is much simpler and 'just > works' without requiring a massive engineering effort. > > Regards, > > Kristoffer Sheather > CloudCentral > > Mobile: +61 475 048 864 | Switch: +61 2 6160 7624 | Email: > [email protected] > LinkedIn: [image: View Kristoffer Sheather's profile on LinkedIn] > <http://au.linkedin.com/in/kristoffersheather> | Skype: > kristoffer.sheather | Twitter: http://twitter.com/kristofferjon > [image: CloudCentral - Secure Australian Cloud] > <http://www.cloudcentral.com.au/?utm_source=default-signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cloudcentral> > > ------------------------------ > *From*: "ilya" <[email protected]> > *Sent*: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:11 AM > *To*: [email protected] > *Subject*: RightScale 2016 State of the Cloud Report > > Here is the latest State of the Cloud Report > > > http://assets.rightscale.com/uploads/pdfs/RightScale-2016-State-of-the-Cloud-Report.pdf > > > My thoughts: while initially, it may seem that CloudStack is about 4-7% > margin behind OpenStack, considering that: > 1) Marketing budget is at least 500 times less > 2) Active committer base is 30 times smaller > 3) Overall resources are at least 100 times less > And some fairly large sized CCP customers failed to participate in this > survey. > > With limited resources we've got and numbers we showed, we are doing > REALLY WELL! I think it is a testament to job well done by everyone > involved in ACS community and beyond! > > Regards > ilya > > > > >
