Hello,

On the French Market :
1 year ago every body talk about OpenStack.
Now nobody care.
Why because a lot of big company lost a huge amount of money in POC

CloudStack is business ready.
We see more and more ISV build plugin for Cloudstack

In the 3.4 billion you have hardware, software and consulting.

HP sell Openstack with his hardware and mix the revenue.
Every Openstack supplier do that.

3.4 billion doesn't really exist !

A bient?t

Jules


Le 28 avr. 2016 ? 17:50, Will Stevens 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> a ?crit :

I would be curious to know how many billions of $ of consulting and operational 
costs were incurred to boost the $3.4B of revenues.  :)  I wonder which number 
is bigger...

You still can't upgrade an openstack cloud, so if you want to go to a new 
version, you have to build a new cloud and migrate all of your workloads.

I am not saying you can't make money with openstack, but I would rather be an 
openstack consultant than an openstack provider, and that says a lot about the 
actual technology...

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Sunando Bhattacharya 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I really don't know on what basis we are saying that openstack doesn't work... 
$3.4Bill of revenues !!!

Fact is openstack is production-grade and catching up fast on most counts with 
ACS, and actually ahead on some features like NFV.

Lets call a spade a spade

Sunando Bhattacharya
M +91 97111 52299<tel:%2B91%2097111%2052299>
www.indiqus.com <http://www.indiqus.com>

[http://newsletter.indiqus.in/icons2/blogger.png] 
<https://www.indiqus.com/blog>   
[http://newsletter.indiqus.in/icons2/linkedin.png]  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/indiqus-technologies-pvt-ltd->   
[http://newsletter.indiqus.in/icons2/twitter.png]  
<https://twitter.com/INDIQUS>   
[http://newsletter.indiqus.in/icons2/google-plus.png]  
<https://plus.google.com/+Indiqus_technologies/about>   
[http://newsletter.indiqus.in/icons2/facebook.png]  
<https://www.facebook.com/indiqus>


This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and/or 
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the original 
message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such 
action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments 
for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no 
liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.


On 28 April 2016 at 8:26:21 PM, Giles Sirett 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:

+1 to that will

Kind Regards
Giles

D: +44 20 3603 0541<tel:+44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111 
2055<tel:+44%20796%20111%202055>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>





[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
@shapeblue

On 28 Apr 2016, at 15:39, Will Stevens 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Openstack is just bitter because they still don't have a product that works and 
our product works just fine.  Just goes to show that more money doesn't always 
solve the problem...  :)  All that money and almost no success stories.  Kind 
of sad really...

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Greetings,

Just bumped onto this article, thought of sharing:

http://www.eweek.com/cloud/openstack-revenues-approaching-3.4b-451-research.html

<snip>
The decision to turn over OpenStack to a foundation in 2012 stands in contrast 
to the CloudStack platform and its parent, Citrix. Citrix 
donated<http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/citrix-walks-away-from-openstack-moves-to-apache-cloudstack.html>
 CloudStack to the Apache Software Foundation, but it was never set up with the 
same true, multi-stakeholder, stand-alone foundation as OpenStack's.

"If Citrix would have done a foundation around CloudStack, we would now be at a 
Cloudstack Summit, not OpenStack Summit," Sadowski said." Sadowski said.
<snip>

The bold highlighted line was hurting a little bit!

Cheers,
Madan

--
Madan Ganesh Velayudham
Founder & CEO
ActOnMagic

Cloud Governance, Analytics, Management Simplified with ActOnCloud!
www.actonmagic.com<http://www.actonmagic.com/>


Reply via email to