OK. I agree with that. We may want to figure out how to vote on this since we are voting on: - which variations we want to allow for use - how many to approve
Etc... On Jun 10, 2016 11:58 AM, "John Burwell" <[email protected]> wrote: > Will, > > So long as I have been around, the PMC has never voted to accept the vote > of the community. Since PMC members cast binding votes and all votes > require a minimum number of bind ing votes, the notion of PMC “acceptance” > is baked into all votes. If you feel we are ready for a vote, it should be > sufficient to open a [VOTE] thread on dev@ explaining the changes to the > marketing and trademark guidelines. > > Thanks, > -John > > > [email protected] > www.shapeblue.com > @shapeblue > > > > > > On Jun 10, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> > wrote: > > @John, if you concerned about the PMC's ownership of the vote, we could > potentially hold a vote after the public one to approve what the public > vote chooses. Does this resolve any concerns you may have with this? > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I personally don't think the vote should be done in private@ for this >> one. I think the vote should be held with all of the following lists >> included: marketing@, dev@ and users@ >> >> I think it is important that the user and marketing teams who are using >> ACS have a say on this topic as it is not code related and is more likely >> to affect their use cases than that of a contributing developer. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:38 AM, John Burwell < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Will, >>> >>> I agree that we need a vote, but I don’t see why it needs to be >>> private. Since the conversation has been public, why don’t we vote across >>> all committers on dev@? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -John >>> >>> [email protected] >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Will Stevens <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I would like to bump this conversation. I would like for us to select a >>> few of these and then vote on them in the PMC for the purpose of adding >>> them to our official marketing and trademark guidelines pages. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Will >>> >>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Julia Simon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Agreed, and Will, this looks great. A font for each element would also >>>> need to be defined in the branding guidelines. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, 13 May 2016, Tim Mackey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's exactly what I had in mind, Will. >>>>> >>>>> btw, I rather like Julia's "contributor to" role logo idea as well. >>>>> >>>>> I feel anything which adds to brand identity and allows users to >>>>> spread the word is a good thing. >>>>> >>>>> -tim >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Will Stevens < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You are looking for something like this, right Tim? Pardon the >>>>>> choice of font, I am not a designer and did not even try. :P We will >>>>>> want >>>>>> to make sure the font names are listed in the color pallet template. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1392076/apache_cloudstack-01.png >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tim Mackey <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> One observation I'd make is that the proposed logos all work well if >>>>>>> you have a white (or light) background. It would be good to have a >>>>>>> variant >>>>>>> which allows for a dark background. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To my eye, most of the "powered by" statements are too small. I like >>>>>>> the weight of #9, but wish it included the monkey. Maybe something along >>>>>>> the lines of #8, but with the font size for the "powered by" of #9 with >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> "powered by" statement placed centered above the "apache cloudstack" >>>>>>> emblem? I'm not a designer or I'd mock something up to better visualize >>>>>>> what's in my head. For me, the monkey is part of our brand identity, and >>>>>>> I'd hate to see it subordinate in a logo program. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -tim >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Will Stevens < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Haha. I am not sure if I should be taking that as a compliment or >>>>>>>> not Giles. :P >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On the topic of the branding colors, I have not found any color >>>>>>>> guidelines for marketing material (and I have looked). Is that >>>>>>>> because we >>>>>>>> don't have one, or is it just because my google foo is weak? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While I agree the the "color" version is the most consistent with >>>>>>>> the current branding, is there anything that says we can't use colors >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> better match the context in which the graphics are used? If we do >>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>> restrict the colors, I think we should definitely think about creating >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> color guide which we all use. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I ask because the graphic designer in me actually likes the dark >>>>>>>> blue version in many cases. In addition to that, we will need to >>>>>>>> increase >>>>>>>> our marketing activities going forward and having quality guidelines >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> resources will help us present a cleaner and higher quality message. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't want to derail this conversation, but I thought it was >>>>>>>> relevant considering Giles comments. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Giles Sirett < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andre – this is great work – thanks for progressing >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree 100% with everything Will said >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (which is strange for me) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I’ll refine his comments a little more >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Although I like the novelty of 6, I think 7 will be more usable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think both 8 and 9 would be useful in different situations >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, if possible I’d suggest that we publish 7,8 and 9 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suggest that we only publish the blue versions of each as the >>>>>>>>> colour is quite intrinsic to the brand >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I’m sure some people will disagree. If anybody does, shout in the >>>>>>>>> next day or two and we can have a vote on this list so Andre can >>>>>>>>> progress >>>>>>>>> (which I think will be the first ever vote on marketing@) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Giles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>>>>>>> @shapeblue >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* Will Stevens [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 12 May 2016 16:48 >>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think that #4 and #5 are the least useful because Apache >>>>>>>>> CloudStack is not mentioned and the monkey alone does not have enough >>>>>>>>> brand >>>>>>>>> recognition in order for those to effectively present the Apache >>>>>>>>> CloudStack >>>>>>>>> project (IMHO). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> #6 and #7 are my favorite vertical versions. #8 and #9 are my >>>>>>>>> favorite horizontal versions. I think in some situations #1 will >>>>>>>>> also be >>>>>>>>> useful. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Cyrano Rizzo <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Congratulations by the great job! All of them are very good, I >>>>>>>>> think the 3/9 and 2 are the best, in this order. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I didn't get the difference between 3 and 9, unless the size. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> []´s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cyrano Rizzo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +55 (11) 99769-9001 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Universidade de São Paulo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Walter, André < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello to all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry for the miss out, our security rules were too strong ;-). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The URL http://poweredbycloudstack.bitcloud.cloud/ should be >>>>>>>>> accessible now from everywhere and we are looking forward for your >>>>>>>>> comments >>>>>>>>> and feedback. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Von:* Giles Sirett [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2016 20:15 >>>>>>>>> *An:* <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes - me too >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Giles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <+44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111 2055 >>>>>>>>> <+44%20796%20111%202055> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>>>>>>> @shapeblue >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 11 May 2016, at 17:10, Julia Simon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi André, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am having trouble accessing that url. Would you check to make >>>>>>>>> sure it's valid. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Danke schön! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Julia >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Walter, André < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello to all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sorry for the delay, but our designer was off for some weeks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But finally we have put together some proposals and I personally >>>>>>>>> like the idea with the “stamp “ (option 5 or 6) best. So you can >>>>>>>>> stamp your >>>>>>>>> homepage or any other Marketing Material with “powered by ACS”. And >>>>>>>>> we can >>>>>>>>> easily include the proposal of Giles and replace the slogan “powered >>>>>>>>> by” >>>>>>>>> with "supporter of" or "contributor to" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kindly have a look at following URL >>>>>>>>> http://poweredbycloudstack.bitcloud.cloud/ and we are looking >>>>>>>>> forward for your comments and feedback. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *André Walter* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BIT.Group GmbH >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> T +49 3591 5253 1415 >>>>>>>>> F +49 3591 5253 9999 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> M +49 160 90822573 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> E [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Von:* Giles Sirett [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 23:23 >>>>>>>>> *An:* <[email protected]>; Sally Khudairi >>>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andre - welcome to the community - great to see you here and I >>>>>>>>> look forward to working with you and your colleagues >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's great news that you can dive straight in with this important >>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can't find the old thread on this, but in summary I think it >>>>>>>>> stalled because the cloudstack logo didn't fit nicely inside the >>>>>>>>> "powered >>>>>>>>> by" circle that Sally references ( it resulted in the cloudstack logo >>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>> very small) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe it could be made to work bu somebody with an eye for design. >>>>>>>>> But as ilya says, we don't have to stick with that design - it's not >>>>>>>>> obligatory >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe best to come up with some ideas and post a link here >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also : I've always thought that it would be good to give some >>>>>>>>> options that are not just "powers by" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A few with words like "supporter of" and "contributor to" would be >>>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Giles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <+44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111 2055 >>>>>>>>> <+44%20796%20111%202055> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <image004.png> <http://www.shapeblue.com/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Giles Sirett* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *CEO* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *, * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *ShapeBlue* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *d: * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *+44 20 3603 0541 | s: +44 203 603 0540* >>>>>>>>> <+44%20%2020%203603%200541%20%7C%20s:%20+44%20203%20603%200540> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *m: * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *+44 7961112055* <+44%207961112055> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *e: * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] | t: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *w: * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *www.shapeblue.com* <http://www.shapeblue..com/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *a: * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <image003.png> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. >>>>>>>>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is >>>>>>>>> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil >>>>>>>>> Consultoria >>>>>>>>> Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under >>>>>>>>> license from >>>>>>>>> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The >>>>>>>>> Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue >>>>>>>>> Ltd. >>>>>>>>> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >>>>>>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are >>>>>>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is >>>>>>>>> addressed. Any >>>>>>>>> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not >>>>>>>>> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. >>>>>>>>> If you >>>>>>>>> are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take >>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>> action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please >>>>>>>>> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in >>>>>>>>> error. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 29 Jan 2016, at 01:14, Sally Khudairi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, André --your timing is good, actually. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We just launched the new ASF identity yesterday, and will continue >>>>>>>>> rolling out the new assets over the next few months. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To that end, we have an existing "Powered By Apache" campaign that >>>>>>>>> can be used generally or specifically with certain Apache projects. >>>>>>>>> Please >>>>>>>>> see http://apache.org/foundation/press/kit/#poweredby >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Again, given that our launch was just 26 hours ago, the icon for >>>>>>>>> Apache CloudStack on file is the old one, but still very much valid. >>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>> this fits your needs, feel free to use as appropriate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Warmest regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sally >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vice President, Marketing & Publicity >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Apache Software Foundation >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> = = = = = >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> vox +1 617 921 8656 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> gvox +1 646 598 4616 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> skype sallykhudairi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* "Walter, André" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *To:* "[email protected]" < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:28 AM >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Supported by ACS logo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am pretty new to CloudStack community and want to start my >>>>>>>>> thread with a short introduction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am working for BIT.Group GmbH and heading the area called “Cloud >>>>>>>>> Services”. There we are delivering Infrastructure Management Services >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> big customers (mainly SAP) with a clear focus on open source >>>>>>>>> technologies. >>>>>>>>> That means we do classical IT outsourcing specialized on implementing >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> operating virtualization and OS layer with Experts / Administrators in >>>>>>>>> Germany (Dresden) and China (Shanghai). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Giving this background we started last year to build up an own >>>>>>>>> “BIT.Cloud” and decided to use Apache Cloud Stack and Ceph as focus >>>>>>>>> technologies. Our experiences with ACS are really good (clearly we >>>>>>>>> find the >>>>>>>>> one or the other optimization potential ;-)), we had great >>>>>>>>> interactions in >>>>>>>>> the community already and we decided to deepen our involvement. So >>>>>>>>> hopefully you will hear now inputs from our side quite more often and >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>> especially want to increase the CloudStack presence in the German >>>>>>>>> speaking >>>>>>>>> area. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What we currently miss is a kind of “supported by ACS” logo, >>>>>>>>> because we want to publish our Cloud offering with a clear statement >>>>>>>>> of our >>>>>>>>> focus technologies. I heart that there were already discussions in the >>>>>>>>> past, but somehow it did not come to an end. Do you also see the need >>>>>>>>> or in >>>>>>>>> general would you support the initiative to get such a logo? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In case most of you answer the question with yes, I see following >>>>>>>>> main questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> · Would you use the cloud stack (word), the monkey logo >>>>>>>>> or the combination of both? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> · Are there any legal restrictions which we have to >>>>>>>>> consider (e.g. does somebody has to approve this from ASF side?) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> · Do you know why the initiative in the past did not >>>>>>>>> succeed? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> · Did someone in the past already created some drafts or >>>>>>>>> similar? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> · In case we have some logo proposals clearly some will >>>>>>>>> like it and some won’t. Will we start a voting procedure or how does >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> work usually? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please excuse this maybe stupid questions, but as I initially >>>>>>>>> wrote, I am quite new to this J. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My wish would be, that everybody can use such a “supported by” >>>>>>>>> logo in case he wants to and I would offer to engage our designer, to >>>>>>>>> prepare some design proposals and share the results with you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am looking forward for a fruitful discussion and your feedback. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *André Walter* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cloud Services >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BIT.Group GmbH >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> T +49 3591 5253 1415 >>>>>>>>> F +49 3591 5253 9999 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> M +49 160 90822573 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> E [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This email was Virus checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related >>>>>>>>> services: >>>>>>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build >>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build/> | CSForge – >>>>>>>>> rapid IaaS deployment framework <http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> >>>>>>>>> CloudStack Consulting >>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> | CloudStack >>>>>>>>> Software Engineering >>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> >>>>>>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support >>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> | CloudStack >>>>>>>>> Bootcamp Training Courses >>>>>>>>> <http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Julia Simon *Opérations marketing et ventes *| *Marketing & >>>>>>>>> Sales Operations >>>>>>>>> t 514.447.3456 ext. 1103 <514.447.3456%20ext.%201103> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> c 514.993.6661 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *CloudOps *Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions >>>>>>>>> Experts >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cloudops.com >>>>>>>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloudops-dot-com-url&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>>>>>> *| *420 rue Guy *|* Montréal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <image001.jpg> >>>>>>>>> <https://cloud.ca/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloud-ca-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>>>>>> <image001.jpg> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/2014/11/cloudops-tops-deloittes-technology-fast-50/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=fast-50-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Julia Simon *Opérations marketing et ventes *| *Marketing & Sales >>>> Operations >>>> t 514.447.3456 ext. 1103 >>>> c 514.993.6661 >>>> >>>> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts >>>> cloudops.com >>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloudops-dot-com-url&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>> *| *420 rue Guy *|* Montréal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://cloud.ca/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloud-ca-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>> >>>> <http://www.cloudops.com/2014/11/cloudops-tops-deloittes-technology-fast-50/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=fast-50-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
