Hello, the coverage of LibreOffice 3.3 is generally good, and the span of the coverage (the number of written articles) is excellent.
Anyone , any journalist is entitled to his/her own opinion, but this article is somewhat problematic. I usually read these articles and their comments carefully. They are often good sources to understand the "outside" perception of an OSS project or product. Yet I don't manage to find one point that is not sheer and free criticism of LibreOffice in this one. http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217679/libreoffice_33_handson_with_the_free_office_suite.html My question might be naive so bear on with me: how can we avoid this amount of crap ? "it's really only good for Open Source Developers but not in real life" That's not journalism that's prejudice. "I miss SharePoint"..WTF? Your comments are welcome (note: I might have taken the issue in a completely wrong way). Best, -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
