On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 14:26 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > the coverage of LibreOffice 3.3 is generally good, and the span of the > coverage (the number of written articles) is excellent. > > Anyone , any journalist is entitled to his/her own opinion, but this > article is somewhat problematic. I usually read these articles and > their comments carefully. They are often good sources to understand the > "outside" perception of an OSS project or product. Yet I don't manage > to find one point that is not sheer and free criticism of LibreOffice > in this one. > http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217679/libreoffice_33_handson_with_the_free_office_suite.html > My question might be naive so bear on with me: how can we avoid this > amount of crap ? "it's really only good for Open Source Developers but > not in real life" That's not journalism that's prejudice. "I miss > SharePoint"..WTF? > > Your comments are welcome (note: I might have taken the issue in a > completely wrong way). >
Hi Charles, That would be bad if he wrote that, but I can't find those words in that article anywhere? //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
