According to the blog of Alfresco, LO is now offering integration as experimental feature: http://blogs.alfresco.com/wp/wabson/2012/11/01/cmis-support-in-libreoffice-experimental-features/
What are the plans on CIMS for LO 4.0 ? I think this is a great feature and selling point vs MSO. Immanuel On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Immanuel Giulea <giulea.imman...@gmail.com>wrote: > OpenERP mentions explicitely OO but nothing about LO. > > Since LO is the improved version of OO, has anyone considered to contact > the people from OpenERP to get them to update their docs? > > If we arguing in favor of integration with the product, we need their docs > to be update so we can back up ourselves. And it should be tested. > > I also found out about the OPAL extension that used to work with OO > http://forge.alfresco.com/gf/project/opal/ > > And Alfresco is looking for help to integrate with LO, which is good news > for us. > http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Help_Wanted#LibreOffice_CMIS_integration > > > Cheers, > > Immanuel > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Boudi van Vlijmen <bo...@vanvlijmen.nl>wrote: > >> Congratulations! The good news is: Microsoft takes the effort to write a >> document against LO&OO! If there is no threath, there is no reason to do so! >> >> - OpenERP integrates best with LibreOffice and OpenOffice ( >> http://doc.openerp.com/v6.1/book/8/8_20_Config/8_20_Config_reports.html) >> and not with MS-Word. (more cost effective than other business solutions) >> - Work tool aware organisations don't fall in the MS overtooling trap >> (a big issue for document management). Work files should be .odf and >> presentation and archiving files should be .pdf >> - MS - Office does not support all .odf 1.2 functionality (comments?) >> - Email clients for desktops will soon be outdated. Not for no reason >> Mozilla stoped with the Thunderbird development Calendering today is a >> typical cloud application. >> - By the way sending documents with email from LO works fine... >> - MS Outlook integration is based on legacy standards causing all >> kind of problems for receivers with no MS software.... (The .dat >> attachment >> problem) >> - Desktop calendaring (Outlook) will soon be outdated >> - Cloud colaberation tools like Google Drive work fine with OO and >> LO. Who needs colaboration tools outside the cloud? >> - Pivot tables work (different) >> - Last but not least LibreOffice features NO foot in the door file >> format trap! Also called vendor-lock. >> >> So where is the argument? >> LibreOffice; >> Write is a perfect workdocument editing tool with great archive (pdf) >> creation tool integrated, >> Calc is a perfect spreadsheet tool with great archive (pdf) creation tool >> integrated, >> Impress is a perfect presentation creation tool with great archive (pdf) >> creation tool integrated, >> is a great platform for business administration automation with an >> integrated IDE and a nice set of database tools included, >> >> All for less than half the price! ;-) >> And LibreOffice Works on Windows and OSX for the same price. >> >> In fact all the USPs for Word, Excel and Powerpoint disappear in a cloud >> of dust. >> MS clearly tries to sell outdated USPs as unique to the Late Majority. >> Time for the Early Majority to switch! Time for LibreOffice! >> >> Met vriendelijke groet, >> Kind regards, >> Boudi van Vlijmen <http://www.vanvlijmen.nl> >> >> *Open standards or Open Wallets that is the question!* >> http://forumstandaardisatie.nl/ >> Beleidsquote "Rijksdiensten moeten vanaf april 2008 ODF ondersteunen. >> Mede-overheden en overige instellingen volgen uiterlijk december 2008. >> ODF = .odt voor tekst, .ods voor spreadsheets, .odp voor presentaties" >> http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Immanuel Giulea < >> giulea.imman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Microsoft put out a three-page document that hits on some of the >>> weaknesses >>> of LO (and bundles LO with OOo): >>> >>> http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/0/D/D0DA0C4B-22DE-40C7-A84D-0C7E03347A9C/Considering-LibreOffice-and-OO-v2.pdf >>> >>> Is there some materials that can explain the strong points of LO and >>> offer >>> counter-arguments to what MS says ? >>> >>> Some of the key points would be: >>> - lack of calendaring/email >>> - collaboration tools >>> - pivot tables >>> >>> >>> Immanuel >>> >>> -- >>> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org >>> Problems? >>> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >>> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >>> List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ >>> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >>> deleted >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
