Perhaps Italo could chime in and inform us if having "no label is not an option". We have to be consistent in a marketing plan, whether short or long-term.
But, for me, the preference would be to continue with no label if this is an option, however, if a label is needed, "Community Edition" is what I would prefer. From my perspective, there is no negative connotation, the public will get exactly what it is, a version of LibreOffice built by members of the volunteer community and used by the members of the TDF/LibreOffice. I don't believe that new-comers to LibreOffice site will see the "LibreOffice Community Edition" as a negative, as long as our website messaging is clear on the TDF and LibreOffice Mission Statements. As for any commercial versions of LibreOffice, then "Powered by" is still my preferred, regardless of any community label. But, really, Italo should chime in and set us straight, again, and inform us if going with no label is an option. There is nothing wrong with going back on a marketing plan, but as long as we are being consistent in our planning discussions. More members need to chime in on this important discussion ... I am surprised that non of the board members nor any of the implicated commercially-connected members are not participating in this discussion that was called by Italo. Especially when Italo has set a deadline date for the discussion and then membership vote. More members need to be informed that this discussion is taking place; just so that the membership all get to have their say. Marc Le 2020-10-23 à 07 h 40, Justin Luth a écrit : > +1 to what Uwe and Michael and Telesto have been saying. > > Personal / Community are not accurate labels because they imply > missing features. LibreOffice as we currently know it is full > featured. By introducing these labels, you are signaling an intent to > "dumb down" LibreOffice. > > The current real distinction is around support. So, using Linux > terminology, a more accurate label would be LibreOffice Rolling verses > LibreOffice LTS. But that is geeky terminology, so for that reason it > probably isn't appropriate. > > Therefore since none of the suggested labels properly convey meaning, > I too prefer the supposedly unavailable "no label" solution for TDF > builds. > > Justin > > > On 10/21/20 11:52 AM, Uwe Altmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> Am 20.10.20 um 10:50 schrieb Michael Weghorn: >> >>> If "no label is not an option" (as stated by Italo), I'd currently >>> prefer something like "TDF Edition" over "Personal Edition" or >>> "Community Edition" as well, given the negative/misleading connotations >>> the latter may result in. >> "no label is not an option" is Italos and some others - professional >> as I have to admit - option. But "no label" also still is an option - >> no decision made yet. >> >> And imho no label is the preferred option (as stated in past). >> Uwe Altmann >> > -- Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com https://www.parEntreprise.com parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org LibreOffice Office Suite - 200 million users and growing! Over 1,000 project developers with impeccable help from its user base. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy