On 28-Jan-08, at 1:17 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote: > My suggestions: > - let's define ourselves in positive terms, not by what we are > not. And who knows, perhaps we will, next quarter?
my comments in brackets were background information to clarify what we were stating, not to be part of the message > - I like Bill's analogy: > >> ... OpenID is a building block upon which end users can/will begin >> to establish their independence on the web in much the same way >> that ISPs gave individuals actual email independence from the old >> walled gardens of that bygone era of Prodigy, Compuserve, and the >> pre-Internet versions of AOL and MSN. An analogy is way to move a message. Let's agree on the message first! :-) > > And I know everybody will hate me for saying this, but: > >> +OpenID is a set of specifications to solve user internet identity >> problems > > > is not going to be comprehensible to many people. What exactly are > "user internet identity problems"? This is a messaging platform, not the message. Do we agree that we want to move this message? Do you have a suggestion on a concise way of describing the problem? -- Dick _______________________________________________ marketing mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/marketing
