Dear MARMAM,

On behalf of my co-authors, I am happy to announce the publication of two 
review papers that recently published in the Journal of Marine Science and 
Engineering's Special Issue on Ocean Noise: From Science to 
Management<https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jmse/special_issues/ocean_noise>.
Guan S, Brookens T. The Use of Psychoacoustics in Marine Mammal Conservation in 
the United States: From Science to Management and Policy. Journal of Marine 
Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(5):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050507

Abstract: Underwater sound generated from human activities has been long 
recognized to cause adverse effects on marine mammals, ranging from auditory 
masking to behavioral disturbance to hearing impairment. In certain instances, 
underwater sound has led to physical injuries and mortalities. Research efforts 
to assess these impacts began approximately four decades ago with behavioral 
observations of large whales exposed to seismic surveys and rapidly progressed 
into the diverse field that today includes studies of behavioral, auditory, and 
physiological responses of marine mammals exposed to anthropogenic sound. 
Findings from those studies have informed the manner in which impact 
assessments have been and currently are conducted by regulatory agencies in the 
United States. They also have led to additional questions and identified 
information needed to understand more holistically the impacts of underwater 
sound, such as population- and species-level effects, long-term, chronic, and 
cumulative effects, and effects on taxa for which little or no information is 
known. Despite progress, the regulatory community has been slow to incorporate 
the best available science in marine mammal management and policy and often has 
relied on outdated and overly simplified methods in its impact assessments. To 
implement conservation measures effectively, regulatory agencies must be 
willing to adapt their regulatory scheme to ensure that the best available 
scientific information is incorporated accordingly.

Guan S, Brookens T, Vignola J. Use of Underwater Acoustics in Marine 
Conservation and Policy: Previous Advances, Current Status, and Future Needs. 
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(2):173. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020173

Abstract: The interdisciplinary field of assessing the impacts of sound on 
marine life has benefited largely from the advancement of underwater acoustics 
that occurred after World War II. Acoustic parameters widely used in underwater 
acoustics were redefined to quantify sound levels relevant to animal 
audiometric variables, both at the source and receiver. The fundamental 
approach for assessing the impacts of sound uses a source-pathway-receiver 
model based on the one-way sonar equation, and most numerical sound propagation 
models can be used to predict received levels at marine animals that are 
potentially exposed. However, significant information gaps still exist in terms 
of sound source characterization and propagation that are strongly coupled with 
the type and layering of the underlying substrate(s). Additional challenges 
include the lack of easy-to-use propagation models and animal-specific 
statistical detection models, as well as a lack of adequate training of 
regulatory entities in underwater acoustics.

Although the papers are open access, feel free to contact Shane or me with any 
questions that you may have.

Thanks,
Tiff


Tiffini J. Brookens
Biologist
Marine Mammal Commission
4340 East-West Highway, Room 700
Bethesda, MD 20814
Phone: 301.504.0087
Fax: 301.504.0099

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
MARMAM@lists.uvic.ca
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to