Sam
What you think about Colin Leys?
Mario
-----Mensagem Original-----
De: Sam Pawlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enviada em: Quarta-feira, 13 de Outubro de 1999 16:16
Assunto: M-TH: Development
> Gerald L,
>
> Its all quite sketchy really. The paper was just meant as a summary
> and critique of most of the development schools to familiarze people
> with their thinking and hopefully spur more thinking, reading and
> debate.
> A serious scholarly work would include people like
> J.Bhagwati,B.Belassa, S.Lall, A Sen, A Bhaduri,A Krueger, Douglass North
> and maybe even Dornbusch (yuck). Samir Amin deserves better discussion
> too. Quite frankly, I couldn't be bothered going over Kuznets, Lewis,
> and the Harrod-Domar and Solow growth models again. Because of their
> methodology and narrow scope I just don't think they speak to us
> today.I'm mostly interested in how capitalism impedes development, how
> (the political and class developed)current trade and finance patterns
> ensure a subsidiary role for the peripheral countries. How, what Doug H
> calls the 'Americanization' of finance will play out in developing
> core-periphery relations.
> I've read the Chilcote/Edelstein book. I even have a copy of it. It's
> very good though dated and still a little thin on Spanish/Portuguese
> language theorists. I recomment Cristobal Kay and Jorge Larrain.
> You are a professional economist, what do you think?
>
> sam Pawlett
>
>
> --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
>
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
