Classes at all times rise  and fall and develop - emerge, on the basis  of 
changes in the material power of production and how this material power is  
organized as a combination of human labor + tools, instruments, machines +  
energy 
source. 
 
^^^^ CB: So why do you refer to landed _property_ as the basis of feudalism  ?
 
MP: Honest question
 
Simple, because it was. 
 
The primary form of wealth is land . . . hence landed property relations.  
Machinery and there were machines under feudalism, was not the primary form of  
wealth. Species currency was not the primary form of wealth during the epoch 
of  feudalism. 
 
Hey . . . I thought you were a lawyer and had several degrees. 
 
The primarily form of wealth during the epoch of the bourgeois mode of  
production is the paper form of capital and today super  symbolic expressions 
of 
wealth stored in machines as data. The wealth of  the bourgeoisie is not in the 
form of paper money in banks or gold ownership. 
 
^^^^^
CB: So was feudalism the expression of landed _property_ or was it  the
expression of feudal means of production and technology ? 
 
MP: There you go with the lawyer logic. Means of production can be  described 
based on the combination of human labor + machinery, tools and  instruments + 
energy source. Machines, tools and instruments existed during  the landed 
property relations called feudalism. 
 
Your question makes no sense and is bogus. Feudalism means the political  
form of rule associated with the fief during the epoch of landed property  
relations. 
 
Mr. Lawyer . . . with all the degree . . . does not the word feudalism  comes 
from the word and concept of fief describing a political form of rule? 
 
Let me guess. The teacher left this out of the course in which you got your  
degrees you are so prone to boost about. 
 
CB: "Value" relations are property relations.


MP: Poor me with my Toffler ideology. I always though that the value  
relations were relations of product exchange involving what many Marxist  call 
abstract labor or the exchange of labor equivalents. These products are  
exchanged 
on the basis of value - the congealed abstract labor in them and  acquire the 
form of commodities. 
 
Poor me. Today I discover that "Value" relations are property relations. 
 
What is value? 

Value means labor exchange or for some folks,  human labor in the abstract or 
abstract human labor as it exists in relationship  to products, that acquire 
a commodity form.   

The  law of value or the value relationship (a relationship expresses some 
law  system) are not a property relations with property being defined as 
ownership  rights over the means of production. Means of production are not in 
themselves  value. The value relations is a relations involving congealed human 
labor or  human labor in the abstract, embodied in a social act. This social 
act 
is  not the property rights. 
 
You pose the issue incorrectly in my estimate, Mr.  Lawyer. 

The value relations is connected with and understood  as the essence of 
commodity production or exchange of products that acquire a  commodity form. 
The 
words "value relations" means the exchange of human labor  and this relations 
is 
not property but exchange of labor equivalents.  

"Value" relations are property relations." 

Really. 
 
Money expresses value. Expended labor time is the basis of exchange and it  
is represented by money. Since production today is increasingly carried on with 
 decreasing amounts of human labor congealed in the products of exchange -  
commodities, or by advanced robotics and an emerging new technological  regime, 
such production cannot for long be distributed by money. We have  entered an 
era of acute crisis of the bourgeois mode of production.  

Question 1 : CB: So was feudalism the expression of landed  _property_ or was 
it the
Expression of feudal means of production and  technology? 

What a bizarre question. The landed property relations  means relations where 
the primary form of wealth is land rather than movable  property as in gold. 
During this period to time where the primary form of wealth  was land . . . 
wait a minute I answered this already Mr. Lawyer.
 
Wow . . . and you have seeral degrees to boot. 
 
"Value" relations are property relations." 



Melvin P. 
 



_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to