On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:47:50 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > Given that Bertrand Russell rejected verificationism as the > criterion as to > what is science, can you tell me what was his criterion or criteria > for > identifying science as against non-science was?
What makes you think that Russell wasn't a verificationist? It seems to me that his logical atomism was at least by implication, verificationist. > > > Paddy Hackett > > > _______________________________________________ > Marxism-Thaxis mailing list > [email protected] > To change your options or unsubscribe go to: > http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis > > _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list [email protected] To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
