======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Sounds like  a manoeuvre initiated in particular by Democrats representing 
districts with less competitive manufacturers to get tougher language in these 
trade agreements to protect against alleged Japanese and Chinese "currency 
manipulation" and "dumping". 

The administration is probably crafting some weasel words  as we speak in order 
to mollify the auto, steel, and other industries and their unions in exchange 
for the authority to negotiate the deals. 

It's clearly been taking its marching orders from the stronger financial, 
pharmaceutical, and high tech industries in the US who have the most to gain 
from these agreements and who have been driving the process forward.

> On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Dennis Brasky <dmozart1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
> 
> 
> Maybe he'll wait out the November election and then push it.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:36 AM, michael perelman <
> michael.perelm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> It will be interesting to see how hard Obama fights against congressional
>> gridlock for his free-trade treaty, given how weak he is been in fighting
>> for matters in the public interest.
> ________________________________________________
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at: 
> http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/marvgand2%40gmail.com

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to