======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================



> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:03 AM, "Michael Karadjis" <mkarad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Kissack
> 
> That is, that the West, particularly the greedy and desperate EU, wanted to 
> get its hands on the tremendous natural resources of the Ukraine, on its 
> heavy industry and cheap but highly-educated work force. They offered a deal. 
> A very bad deal, under which, European companies would be allowed to plunder 
> the country, but Ukrainian people would not be even allowed to enter the EU, 
> let alone seek employment there.
> 
> Has anyone seen a copy of the proposed EU deal?

The full text of the EU agreement with the Ukraine, together with accompanying 
guides to the various sections, is here. 

http://eeas.europa.eu/ukraine/assoagreement/assoagreement-2013_en.htm

On a quick skim, the documents contain the usual boilerplate about bringing 
Ukrainian trade and investment laws into line with EU treaties. But there are 
few specifics which could inflame public opinion. As you know, the deregulation 
and privatization of industries and infrastructure as well as the "reforms" 
aimed at trade union rights and working class standards by signatory 
governments proceed in piecemeal fashion within the general framework of free 
trade agreements. It is only later that their impact is registered on an unwary 
public.

Here are are a couple of articles from Counterpunch and Consortium News and an 
interview from Real News Network attempting to identify the objectives of 
Western capitalism in the Ukraine which the IMF, EU, and US aid packages and 
agreements are designed to realize.  I don't know whether any or all of the 
contributors are on Louis' Index Librorum Prohibitorum, but I hardly need add 
that in itself would not be sufficiently persuasive to invalidate the facts and 
interpretations which are presented.

"Who In Ukraine Will Benefit From An IMF Bailout?"
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=11614

"Who Benefits From Ukraine’s Economic Crisis?"
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/17/who-benefits-from-ukraines-economic-crisis/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=who-benefits-from-ukraines-economic-crisis

"Corporate interests behind the Ukraine putsch"
http://consortiumnews.com/2014/03/16/corporate-interests-behind-ukraine-putsch/

Finally, an informative article from the Wall Street Journal earlier this week 
on the IMF aid package:

"IMF Reaches Deal to Provide Up to $18 Billion to Ukraine", March 27, 2014

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304418404579464712032792176?KEYWORDS=Ukraine&mg=reno64-wsj

KIEV, Ukraine—Momentum gathered in the West to censure Russia and shore up 
Ukraine's moribund economy, as the International Monetary Fund readied as much 
as $18 billion in rescue loans to help avert a financial collapse.
The IMF agreement—which calls for what Ukrainian officials described as painful 
budget cuts and other measures that will strain the country's fragile 
economy—will unlock additional aid from other donors. IMF official Nikolay 
Gueorguiev told a news conference at Ukraine's central bank in Kiev on 
Thursday. In total, Ukraine is expected to receive a total of $27 billion over 
the next two years.

The IMF said that its executive board would review the deal in April and that 
the precise amount of the IMF loan would depend on the level of support given 
by other lenders, including the U.S. and European Union. A senior EU official 
said on Thursday that the European Commission planned to disburse some €850 
million ($1.17 billion) in loans and grants to Ukraine by June if the country 
completes the IMF accord next month.

The bailout comes as Ukraine grapples with the biggest crisis in its 
post-Soviet history. Mass protests in recent months led to the ouster of former 
President Viktor Yanukovych and the establishment of a new government. Russia, 
disturbed by what it perceives as the new government's pro-Western leanings, 
swiftly seized control and then annexed the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, 
transforming the crisis into the most charged East-West confrontation since the 
Cold War.

Russia came under renewed fire on Thursday for the incursion, as the United 
Nations General Assembly approved a nonbinding resolution calling the Crimean 
referendum to rejoin Russia invalid and urged nations not to recognize it.

Though it carries no legal consequences, the vote illustrated a lack of public 
international support for Russia over the Ukrainian crisis. Only 10 other 
nations—including Syria, North Korea, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Cuba—agreed with 
Russia to reject the resolution.

Russian President Vladimir Putin took steps Thursday to brace against sanctions 
from the West, backing plans for Russia to create its own national payment 
system. The move is aimed at protecting its economy against the kind of 
disruption caused when Visa and MasterCard cut ties last week with Russian 
banks hit by U.S. sanctions over the annexation of Crimea.

Ukraine's new government had been seeking around $30 billion in emergency loans 
to avoid an economic collapse amid its standoff with Russia. The country faces 
dwindling foreign-exchange reserves, a deepening budget deficit and substantial 
debts to Russia's state-run gas giant OAO Gazprom OGZPY -1.08% and foreign 
bondholders.

The EU welcomed the loan agreement and said its own pledge of over €11 billion 
in aid to Ukraine, unveiled earlier in the month, would carry the same 
conditions as the IMF deal. In the U.S., Congress approved $1 billion in loan 
guarantees for Ukraine. In the U.S., the White House urged Ukraine to pass the 
measures needed to win approval from the IMF's board and said it was working 
with Congress "to quickly provide a $1 billion loan guarantee" for Ukraine.

Ukraine is set to hold presidential elections at the end of May, making this a 
difficult time to impose tough changes on the population. Among the actions 
Ukraine must complete before the IMF's board will approve a loan in the range 
of $14 billion to $18 billion are maintaining a flexible exchange rate and 
overhauling the energy sector.

In parliament, Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk outlined a package of tax 
increases and spending cuts he said were needed to secure the IMF loan and 
prevent financial catastrophe. These included a 10% cut in the number of state 
officials, a decrease in pensions for judges and prosecutors, and higher taxes 
on alcohol and tobacco products.

Mr. Yatsenyuk warned that without the measures, the country would go bankrupt 
and suffer a contraction in economic output of 10% this year. The reforms and 
foreign loans would limit the decline to 3%, he said. "There's no other way 
out," he said, blaming the administration of Mr. Yanukovych for leaving the 
country's coffers empty through what he characterized as economic mismanagement 
and theft. Late Thursday, legislators passed one key piece of legislation 
required by the IMF.

Ukraine's government bonds rallied in response to the IMF deal, which investors 
saw as providing Ukraine with enough funds to pay bondholders. The yield on a 
Ukrainian dollar-denominated bond maturing in 2023 fell 0.36 percentage point 
from Wednesday's close to 8.94%, according to Tradeweb. Yields fall as prices 
rise.

In return for the IMF financing, Ukraine needs to make a major dent in its 
budget deficit by cutting spending and raising taxes, the IMF said. It also 
needs to raise natural-gas prices for consumers, the IMF said.

Ukraine's two previous loan deals with the IMF have failed in part because the 
nation has refused to cut generous state subsidies for household gas and 
heating that have left the country heavily in debt. On Wednesday, an official 
with state gas monopoly Naftogaz said Ukraine would raise gas tariffs for 
consumers by about 50% starting May 1.

Ukraine's currency, the hryvnia, has fallen sharply since the country began 
floating its exchange rate in February. The IMF said Thursday that the hryvnia 
was previously overvalued and that Ukraine would need to preserve a flexible 
exchange rate to help the country boost exports and economic growth and rebuild 
its foreign-exchange reserves.

The IMF is also requiring Ukraine to adopt regulations to ensure its banks are 
sound and well capitalized and laws to improve the business climate and fight 
corruption.

Ukrainian central bank chief Stepan Kubiv told the news briefing Thursday that 
the overhauls would be painful. But he said the government must shift "from 
populism to more pragmatic work."

"We are aware such a pragmatic approach might not be welcome," said Mr. Kubiv, 
a former commercial banker who became chairman of the National Bank of Ukraine 
last month, after helping coordinate mass street protests that led to the 
ouster of the previous government. Some opposition to the IMF's requirements 
began surfacing Thursday. Sergei Taruta, governor of Ukraine's industrial 
Donetsk region, called the planned gas-price increases unjustified, saying the 
country should first stop what he called rampant corruption at Naftogaz.

By raising prices without fighting corruption, officials would essentially be 
saying, "We'll keep stealing just as we have been stealing, and simply crawl 
into the pockets of the people" instead, Mr. Taruta said in remarks reported by 
the Interfax news agency.

IMF officials said they were requiring Ukraine to boost audits of Naftogaz as 
part of the loan agreement.

The European Commission welcomed the loan agreement Thursday and said that its 
own pledge of over €11 billion in aid to Ukraine, unveiled earlier this month, 
would carry the same conditions as the IMF deal.

In the U.S., the White House urged Ukraine to pass the measures needed to win 
approval from the IMF's board and said it was working with Congress "to quickly 
provide a $1 billion loan guarantee" for Ukraine.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development said it would supplement 
the IMF program by boosting its investment in Ukraine to up to €1 billion a 
year over the next few years, from its earlier plans of €550 to €750 million a 
year.
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to