******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
Louis, I completely understand your frustration but second Michael's appeal for another chance. The list simply is better with as many differing views as possible. Some of these views are wildly contrary to my own but I find their airing to be instructive and actually help in forming a stronger set of beliefs. But I'm not unsubbing. You are perfectly within your rights. In any event it was your essays that drew me here, not Jim Creegan's. But please reconsider. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Karadjis via Marxism" <marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> To: "Charles Faulkner" <lacena...@comcast.net> Cc: "James Creegan" <sectaria...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 6:11:28 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism] The moderator's note ******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. ***************************************************************** Louis, please let's start this over. I don't want someone to be kicked off due to him replying to a post of mine. Jim may have lashed out at other times (we all get hot under the collar, including you and I) but this reply of his was hardly a fire and brimstone sectarian rant. We need this discussion because no-one around here, except those living in Greece, really has any real idea of what the hell. We're all expressing our opinions and learning from each others' points. I'd probably be saying something different this week and something different last week. It is also a matter of interpretation how to interpret the marxmail guidelines you sent. Jim was doing what he thinks is class analysis. I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of class analysis. But having a form of analysis I disagree with doesn't prove he is playing at being Trotsky or being the best Bolshevik. And this list would lose hugely if it also meant people like Andrew Pollack and Marv Gandall were unsubbed as well. Let's start again and all agree to be respectful in this discussion. _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/lacenaire%40comcast.net _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
