********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

I read this book a couple of years ago and meant to review it then, but
other things got in the way.  To make up for the delay, I’ve done something
bigger – basically a mix of summary and review:

Coakley begins with a brief survey of bourgeois and anti-capitalist
attempts to explain uneven development, from Weber and Durkheim to Gramsci,
Jack goody, Immanuel Wallerstein and Robert Brenner. Coakley is concerend,
in particular, with the different patterns of growth exhibited in Britain
(especially England but also Scotland and Wales) and does so by exploring
the unequal relations between them from the medieval era onwards.

Imposition of feudalism

He notes that the Anglo-Norman conquest resulted in the division of Ireland
into Gaelic and Anglo-Norman regions. While the boundaries and interactions
were fluid, they possessed different social structures. In the Anglo-Norman
areas, a manorial/feudal economy was developed, with the local nobility
owing allegiance to the English monarch. The peasantry which worked the
land for the new elite included a layer of free peasants (largely
transplanted from England) and a larger layer of unfree peasants (serfs) of
Irish stock. This latter group was less free than the unfree peasants
(villeins) in England itself. For instance, they had no legal rights at all.

The crisis of feudalism throughout the 1300s in Europe, including Ireland,
explains the decline of Anglo-Norman power and the English language. It
also reduced free tenants to labourers. This produced a significant return
to England by peasants wishing to avoid greater subjection. The lords in
Ireland were then forced to make concessions to Irish peasants. This
combined with the impact of the plague largely finished off serfdom by
about 1500.

The economy, moreover, had shifted in the 1300s back largely to pasture.
This meant a different form of social organisation to tillage, where
peasants laboured for a lord. Pasture involved a more
full at:
https://theirishrevolution.wordpress.com/2015/06/04/in-review-maurice-coakley-on-how-britain-under-developed-ireland/
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to