Ok, Néstor, when you have time, I'd appreciate you elaborate the ideological limits -indeed, ideology, in Marx and Engels' sense, is to turn everything upside down- of my anti-dialectical "juanbejustismo" (and for practical purposes, you're free to assume I'm Iñigo Carrera's "disciple",) vis á vis my allegations that you (and Lueko, to one degree or another,) so far have been indulging in idealist distributionist* reveries about the direction China is taking.
But please, take your time,-"que se bajen los cambios"- and be clear about it, no going off in a tangent, and no "mirror proofs" -by this I mean, justifying your position by saying you're right just like that- I beg you, so we can all learn about my onanist tendencies. No joke here, I think, in my humble opinion, marxmailers will benefit, and truly, I can't wait to get shook up. * when I say distributionist, I'm referring, daring as I am, to Marx's Critique of the Gotha Programme: "Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of production and hence the presentation of socialism as turning principally on distribution." _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. http://www.windowslive.com/Desktop/PhotoGallery ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
