======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Actually, a lot of the Christian theology that was codified in the Council
of Nicaea in 325 C.E. was neither from the Jerusalem Church nor from Paul:
it originated in an entirely different religious movement, the religion of
Mithra, which arose in Iran around 100 B.C.E. Mithra was a god of light who
sacrificed himself for the redemption of the human race. And the religion
taught that Mithra was born in a cave on 25 December. This cult gained a
large following among the Roman middle classes during the centuries before
Constantine adopted Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire.

As far as the historic Yeshua is concerned: there is no doubt in my mind
that Jesus of the gospels is what is known in literature as a composite
character. One element is the wandering preacher, which in Arabic is called
a "darwish." To this day, Sufi mystic preachers gather a few followers and
wander about, preaching in bazaars to whomever will listen and contribute.
One common feature, described in the poetry of Jalal ad-Din Rumi, the
apostle of Sufism, as well as in the gospels, is writing in the sand. I saw
a darwish come into the bazar in Kerman (in east central Iran) with his
entourage and begin preaching. Near Kerman is one of the most revered of
Sufi shrines, the Shah-e Neamatollah. There is no doubt in my mind that part
of the Jesus character, as well as his cousin John the Baptist, is a
darwish. Others more knowledgeable than I have discussed the Jewish
nationalist whose life ended on a cross with two...what? thieves? Or zealot
comrades? But that is another aspect of the composite Jesus character. And
the third is Mithra himself, the light of the world, who died to redeem all
humanity from evil. However, it is all speculation, because we have no
written record from the time in question, which is surprising, considering
the meticulous records which the Romans kept.

One thing I noticed about Islam when I was traveling in the Middle East,
which I think applies to all religions, especially in that part of the
world: the Arabic word for religion is "ad-Din," which also means
"obligation." For us in the post-bourgeois revolution West, religion is
"faith." In the Middle East it is "obligation." I'm reminded of Reb Tevye in
the Prologue of "Fiddler on the Roof," who explains about the Jews: "Because
of our tradition, each one of us knows who he is and what G-d expects him to
do." For the Muslims, and I think for the Greek (and Russian) Orthodox
Christians, it is the same. And it became clear to me: religion
fundamentally is a way of making people do what the ruling class would like
them to do without using violence to force them. And this is what the
Emperor Constantine the Great understood: the old Roman religion, based on
the Twelve Gods of Mt. Olympus plus each family's "Lares et Penates"
(essentially the deified ancestors), no longer was adequate to hold Roman
society together. A new state religion was needed, and Constantine chose
Christianity, but Christianity was so theologically varied that it was
necessary to define what it was that the new religion believed. That was
done by the bishops who met at Nicaea in 325. The leader of the victorious
Orthodox faction was Athenasius, Bishop of Alexandria, who wrote the new
religions statement of belief. It begins: "I believe in one God, the Father
Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth and of all things visible and
invisible..." and it is known to Christians as the Nicene Creed. It is
recited by all good Catholics and Anglicans as part of the Mass.

There is a lot more that could be said about Christianity in its earliest
years; in fact many books have been written about it. I would recommend
Professor Elaine Pagels's books as a good start. She is an expert on the
texts which were discovered at Nag Hammadi in Egypt, which are some of the
oldest Christian texts ever found and which were rejected by the Council of
Nicaea to be part of the Christian canon of Holy Scripture.

-Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: marxism-bounces+biastg=embarqmail....@lists.econ.utah.edu
[mailto:marxism-bounces+biastg=embarqmail....@lists.econ.utah.edu] On Behalf
Of Nasir Khan
Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 5:19 PM
To: Thomas Bias
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Have a happy and merry December 25

======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


If I have understood Jim Farmelant  correctly, then he certainly has
in mind Jesus' birthday on  December 25  who,  in his view,   is  'one
of  the greatest men, whose teachings continue to benefit the entire
human race'.

Such a  postulation is based on two premises. But we  don't know when
that historic person, Jesus, was born. To ascribe the 25th December as
his  date of birth  belongs to the later history of the Church.

The assertion that his teachings continue to benefit  the entire human
race is without  any historical foundation. In fact, what  people
assume to be the teachings of Jesus is in fact the  version of Pauline
theology: Jesus has nothing to do what Paul preached. Paul's teachings
become known as Christianity.

Whatever Jesus stood for and  preached was followed  in the Jerusalem
Church. But with the defeat of the the Jewish revolt and the
destruction of  the  Temple in 70 A.D.  the Jerusalem Church came to
an end. That also meant the end of the  Jesus movement. But the  end
of Jerusalem Church was the victory of  Paul and his cult of  'divine
Jesus'. Jesus was replaced with Pauline theology and this subsequently
became known as Christianity. It has very little to do with the
apocalyptic Jewish  teacher,  Joshua (Jesus).

I leave the discussion of the  point whether the so-called teachings
of Jesus benefit the  entire human race. Anyone with any understanding
of world history will be surprised to hear that.

On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jim Farmelant <farmela...@juno.com> wrote:
> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
> Today, as the world pauses on the birthday of one of history's greatest
> men, whose teachings continue to benefit the entire human race,
> let us join in toasting the memory of Sir Isaac Newton, and of all
> the giants on whose shoulders he stood.
>
> Jim Farmelant
> ____________________________________________________________
> Diet Help
> Cheap Diet Help Tips. Click here.
>
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=ebxJW8tgEy7tFtQ3G1s-0AAAJ1BRug
I4sJACAWmXIev8NAFPAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYQAAAAAA=
> ________________________________________________
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/naskha3%40gmail.com
>

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/biastg%40embarqmail.com


________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to