======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Does anyone care to refute the below, which I consider to be almost total 
nonsense, before I do?  I sincerely hope somebody else finds Paddy's remarks 
as antithetical to Marxism as I do.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paddy Apling" <e.c.apl...@btinternet.com>

But,  for a primitive economy like China's the revolutionary possibilities
> of capitalism
> are the obvious choice for improving the economy - and the lives of the 
> mass
> of
> the population, PROVIDED  it can be controlled by strong leadership of a
> Marxist-inspired Communist party.
>
> And THIS is to me is the route the Chinese leadership has chosen - an
> experiment
> never tried before, apart from the short-lived New Economic Policy of
> Lenin's last
> years.  A really new phenomenon = Communist-controlled capitalism.
>
> In my view it has a much greater possibility of success than the
> autartichal, but
> inspiring Stekhanovite movement, [involving a minute fraction of the huge
> population] development of the Soviet Union, hamstrung as it was by
> the contiuous threat of external invasion.
>
> China, without provoking militauist intervention, is becoming [has already
> become] such a major player in the world econmy that the US imperialists 
> do
> not dare to enter into miltary conflict with it - what a contrast this is 
> to
> the problems which beset the Soviet Umion in the 1930s and which,
> nevertheless, they managed to contend with sufficent prowess to "tear the
> guts out of the Nazi war machine".
>
> The difference in setting is also that the Bolsheviks seized power from a
> decayed autocracy in the middle of a war - and with little class support
> apart from general opposition to the war - whereas the Chinese leadership
> had a whole generation remembering the struggles for national liberation,
> led by that Communist Party, against the Japenese invasion - which leads
> them  to support whatever it suggests is the best way foward.
>
> In my view the prospects are bright for a new successful development of
> Marxism and Communism..
>
> Paddy
> 


________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to