Comrades, I've read all of this reply by comrade Scott, and I'm impressed. I agree with the main thrust of the statement since it is quite clear. You know, the working class is like a religious and primitive people, in a sense, in that, when it comes to a doctrine or a belief which distinguishes the class from our oppressors or their malign ideology, we can embrace it, unselfishly, as our own, and boldly defend it as the bourgeoisie despicably does exploitation. That ideology which the working class esteems is.... Science...... and the end of the exploitation of man by man.
Communist workers are not "ancient" nor "dogmatic" nor "outdated" nor "out of time" nor any other epithet that non believers can brand upon us, since our philosophy and ideology will always keep our mind and spirit and even our bodies young, because we are not conservative. The working class beholds the new overturning the old, we are that aspect of the contradiction between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat that remains revolutionary, and the catalyst for capitalist innovation and even speculation. Communists can be patient enough to wait for our class to take hold of the means of production; we shan't abandon today the kernel of our revolutionary ideology, and that is: that Marxism Leninism is firstly in the interest of the working class, and then, that it is revolutionary, and that the class struggle is the engine for change. Marxist find themselves having to defend this dogma again and again... I say: if you're against the working class being revolutionary, then why call yourself a Marxist. You won't be able to revise it to work against the proletariat because the communist worker won't allow it. And that is what's meant by the class struggle. May we all unite; and while our class proceeds along the way of the spontaneous struggle, may the communist remain the most conscious and farseeing contingent of our class.... until the two New aspects merge into a higher level or understanding; that is, until the proletariat breaks completely with the bourgeoisie. yours, f580 --- On Tue, 12/21/10, Mark Scott <mark1scot...@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Mark Scott <mark1scot...@yahoo.com> Subject: [MLL] Class Struggle - A Former Dialogue PT 2 To: marxist-leninist-list@lists.econ.utah.edu Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 4:03 PM To say that all Lenin did was develop a doctrine of combat and added nothing to the science of society is a complete deviance of Marxism-Leninism and reveals nothing but the mediocre mind of a revisionist. It further reveals a complete genuine lack of understanding of dialectical materialism as well as historical materialism. The very essence of Marxism is in fact dialectical materialism which Lenin himself called "the living soul of Marxism, its fundamental theoretical root". To the genuine Marxist-Leninist and dialectical thinker, the importance of dialectical materialism is most obvious because it is needed in the study of nature and society, in the theoretical struggle, in the practical leadership of the proletariat and its constructive work. This means that it is a "science of society" that all Marxist-Leninists attribute to the mastery of Lenin and only those that refute Lenin's contribution to the "science of society" are repugnant revisionists. _______________________________________________ Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list _______________________________________________ Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list
