Boy, what a great article.
 
Modern bourgeois communism -  (not to be confused with revisionism and  
Marxist dogmatism of the 21st century), advocates a new social contract. 
 
The social contract is a legal expression of production relations and their 
 property form, as this production relation buttressed, reproduced and is  
protected in the political superstructure. 
 
The bourgeois social contact, without distinction to various  capitalist 
countries is based on wage labor and its sell as the basis for  consumption 
and reproduction or activation of means of production. The bourgeois  social 
contract is the domination of dead labor over living labor to create an  
expanded value. 
 
Pelletier advocates a category of "socially necessary means of life," based 
 on tax credits .. . .  with private property intact,  . . . . ,  rather 
than public property riveted to sovereign birth right, not requiring  a prior 
a contribution of a quantum of labor as the  means and basis  to eat and be 
housed. 
 
The dimensions of ones sovereign birth right is based on dead labor or  
accumulated productive forces awaiting living labor for activation. 
 
Your passionate argument against idlers is noted and acknowledged with  the 
largest contingent of idlers being capitalist and the strata constituting  
the new financial architecture in society. These folks number in the 
millions. 
 
In a population of 300 million, how many idlers - (not quotes) exists that  
are NOT of the financial architecture  amongst a working class of  say 
155,000,000? 
 
Not seeking an answer but food for thought. 
 
The entire article is reproduced below. 
 
WL
 
***
 
 
 
 
Jobs lost to robots could force major changes in our capitalist system 
 
By Dick Pelletier 
 
The greatest challenge the U.S. faces today is to lower unemployment rates. 
 To keep pace with population growth, the economy needs to create 2 million 
new  jobs each year. 
 
However, most economists predict that creating vast numbers of human jobs  
will become more and more difficult as ATMs, on-line banking, self-checkout  
stations, and other areas where technologies are replacing humans, 
continues to  grow. 
 
A recent World Future Society report states that technology is a job  
killer. The whole idea of automation is to do things cheaper, easier, faster, 
or  
better than humans can. Automated systems, by their very nature are 
designed to  replace human labor. 
 
In addition to automated systems stealing jobs, many financially-stressed  
companies have moved their facilities offshore; or are outsourcing jobs  
electronically to India, China, and Indonesia; also, poorly-regulated  
immigration laws allow illegal workers to grab U.S. jobs. 
 
Although today's unemployment hovers around 10%, this is mild compared with 
 what we can expect in the future. It is estimated that 50 million jobs 
will be  lost to automated systems by 2030; and by 2040, robots that can 
accurately mimic  human intelligence will capture more than half of all human 
jobs. 
 
When this writer grew up during the Great Depression, unemployment reached  
25%, which caused soup lines, riots, and turmoil throughout the country. 
 
In our robotic future, 50% of workers will become jobless and this could be 
 disastrous. 
 
Science writer Marshall Brain in his "Robotic Freedom" blog examines the  
problem and offers suggestions that would provide humanity with all the 
benefits  expected from tomorrow's robot wonders, while protecting us from the 
financial  devastations of unemployment. 
 
This bold visionary believes the solution to our impending unemployment  
disaster is to create a $25,000 annual stipend for every U.S. adult. 
 
These payments would be paid for through various possibilities, such as  
allowing ads on currency and public properties, rebates on natural resources,  
lotteries, consumption tax, and income taxes on the rich; plus taxes on 
robots,  automated systems, and emails. 
 
The government collects over $2 trillion in taxes annually, which works out 
 to about $20,000 per U.S. household. It's easy to imagine a stipend 
program that  would pay every adult $25,000. 
 
The stipend would not need to be created immediately. It could be phased in 
 incrementally over the next couple of decades. By 2030 though, Americans 
could  be enjoying a financially-secure, middle class or better lifestyle 
loaded with  leisure time. 
 
Equitable wealth distribution like this allows consumers to spend without  
fear of losing their jobs and becoming destitute. This increased spending 
would  give the economy its biggest boom ever. 
 
How would people spend their extra time in a futuristic world where work is 
 eliminated from everyday life? Some might enroll in education programs; 
others  could awaken their creative juices and become entrepreneurs; still 
others may  enjoy traveling and make that dream visit to distant points on 
Earth, or become  space pioneers and join colonies on Moon, Mars, or artificial 
habitats hovering  above the planet. 
 
Arrival of human-level robots marks a transformative time in history. These 
 silicon wonders promise a utopian wonderworld, but we must revise our 
capitalist  system to turn this vision into reality. 
 
This article appeared in various print publications and on-line blogs.  
Comments always welcome. 
 
About - Contact - Copyright © 2005-2010 Positive Futurist. - Privacy Policy 
 - Terms of Use
 
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from 
_http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm_ 
(http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm) 

_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to