Ken,

One can separate how one interacts with a person of faith belief, than 
discussions on Marxism and history, on a Marxist site.
And I did not suggest that Andrew S. or any comrade, be not allowed to post 
their views and concerns (just not proselytize religion).
>From my view, It is okay to disagree on politics and such spaces should be 
>allowed to express them and consider, with of course being
for socialism and not promoting capitalist interests and bigotry that divides 
and harms - that should always be rejected.  And the
posting of something that is not one's view, but just sharing for people to be 
aware of a document, group or effort, should also be
understood is not advocacy for - but just informing.  Perhaps that was what 
Andrew S. meant? and I jumped too soon after several
of the same themed postings by him.  If so, I apologize to the comrade if that 
was his sole intent.

Sometimes subjects take a long time to reflect and evaluate, when especially 
more is known.  Many "immediate" events, often
get "hot button" reactions and responses, without the full knowledge behind 
such.

I have been affected by just one view or limited information, to come to a 
conclusion, that later I learned more of the history
and context on, to come to a different conclusion (such as the U. S. efforts to 
remove Ghadaffi that influenced me by what initially
was shared, on this very site).

When I personally was involved in the Civil Rights Movement, as other 
movements,  I participated in churches and temples and
listened through religious services and marched with people holding or wearing 
religious based images and writings, and
chose my battles and circumstances.

However, there are times and places, that when a speaker is promoting hate 
speech, whatever the setting - that it should be
challenged.  Sadly, I have witnessed even recently, the acceptance of those 
promoting hate and bigotry - because some lives
matter - more than others.  And to make clear, that I am not equating when I 
state this - that I am referring to repressive forces
of the state or capital, should be viewed as lives "to respect".

I am referring to ideology and organized religious forces (not individual 
non-harming belief), being used by the state and
capital, against workers struggles to oppose exploitation, militarism, racism, 
sexism, etc.  Also there were some very good
people among the SCLC ministers whom I knew, worked with and supported - who 
they understood and opposed ALL bigotry
and hate and exploitation and militarism.

There was much difference between MLK, James Bevel, Walter Fauntroy, as among 
MLK's own children and many families of all
identities and backgrounds, often influenced by reactionary religious thought.  
 Social Gospel, Liberation Theology, etc., whether from
earlier times of "the prophet" Elijah, Mehdi, Zhang Jiao, MLK, Ernesto Cardenal 
Martinez, Daniel Berrigan, Rev. William Barber, etc.
are and should be appreciated, as a moving force that motivated individuals and 
groups into action to oppose injustice.

Karl Marx was an economist, writer and rebel to me, but not a "god" and from my 
view, organized religions leaders have "reasons"
to accept their privileges and reliance on state and capital and willingness to 
adapt and support a ruling class and circles of power.

btw - I am a founding member and been with for over two decades, a large U. S. 
labor union, that is comprised overwhelmingly
of faith believer members.  I am openly Gay and so is that union's 
international president.   Hate speech, is not welcomed or
supported in that union.  And it remains a problem in many self-proclaimed 
socialist groups - that includes accepting misogyny
and patriarchal views and practices, etc.




________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Ken Hiebert 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 5:19 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [marxmail] H-Net Review [H-Buddhism]: Tam on Chau, 'Religion in China: 
Ties That Bind'

John Obrien says:
More religion proselytizing  - especially regular recently by Andrew S. on 
Buddhism - as "Inspiration and Miracles”

Ken Hiebert replies:
I took look a the article posted by Andrew Stewart.  I did not see any kind of 
religious proselytizing.  It’s a review at an academic study of religious 
belief and practice in China.  I have typically not read these articles posted 
by Andrew, not because I don’t think they belong here, but only because I do 
not have the time and energy to benefit from them.

I have usually read the messages posted by John Obrien.  And I have learned 
from them when he talks about his own experience or reminds us of the way that 
Bayard Rustin was treated by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.
But what I don’t get from his messages is any guidance as to how we should 
respond to religious institutions and practice.  Knowing what we know now, how 
should the left have responded to the campaigns of the Southern Christian 
Leadership Conference?  Going to their actions we could be pretty confident 
we’d run into religious organization and religious figures.  How should we have 
responded to them?  I wonder how many atheists stopped singing when they got to 
the words “God is on our side?”  What should they have done?  Stopped singing?  
Turned their backs on the podium?  Should they have brought leaflets and 
placards denouncing religion?

This is not only a question of what we should have done in the past.  We need 
to figure this out for today.  I have never been in Alabama or anywhere near 
there.  But I am willing to guess that some of the workers now voting on 
whether or not to join a union are religious believers.  What do we have to say 
to them?  What should we say to them about their religious beliefs?



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7352): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/7352
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81368949/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to