Some of us thought about Joseph Siglitz this weekend.  He provided an Op Ed 
today in the Washington Post: 

"Neoliberal capitalism has thus failed in its own economic terms: It has not 
delivered growth, let alone shared prosperity. But it has also failed in its 
promise of putting us on a secure road to democracy and freedom, and it has 
instead set us on a populist route raising the prospects of a 21st-century 
fascism...
There is an alternative. A 21st-century economy can only be managed through 
decentralization, entailing a rich set of institutions — from profit-making 
firms to cooperatives, unions, an engaged civil society, nonprofits and public 
institutions. I call this new set of economic arrangements 'progressive 
capitalism.'" 
https://wapo.st/3wy6NKy

I think there's little to disagree with except for his conclusion:  How do we 
achieve 'progressive capitalism' if the capitalists don't go along with this 
program?  Is it just a matter that Milton Friedman misled the powerful and now 
Joseph Stiglitz is pointing out that Friedman was wrong?  I think that US 
capitalism needed Milton Friedmans in the 1970s and still do. Consideration of 
historical forces and class struggle are missing from the Op Ed, which 
describes a problem but no solution.

Mark



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#30316): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/30316
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106071997/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to