On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 08:11 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Where has entry into a bourgeois party "complemented" extra parliamentary > class struggle?
Should we take this to to mean that the trade union, civil rights, womens' gay, and other social movements should not have sought to translate their demands into legislative reforms through the Democratic Party? Or through the Labour and social democratic parties elsewhere? Marxists of all stripes consistently warned that the movements' demands would be watered down in legislation, and the legislation would always be subject to rollbacks by Congress and the Supreme Court, and that ultimately only socialist revolution could fully confer equal for all. But should they have acted on that understanding by placing themselves in opposition to the mass pressure on Democratic administrations to pass the National Labor Relations and Civil Rights acts, for example? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#33048): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33048 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109066560/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
