> On Feb 26, 2025, at 13:58, sartesian via groups.io
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I'd suggest prohibiting reproduction of AI responses
>
Maybe. I think unidentified AI response posts are wrong. But what about
reproducing the response by paraphrasing the response? Instead, why not
reassert our tradition of evidence-based discussion by insisting that chatGPT
not serve as a reference, and that we challenge people as to where they get the
stuff they are posting. I ask for references.
Mark
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35506): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35506
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111336789/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
