At 26 May 2006 07:51:37 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote: > > Alex Kavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > However, although I've used Mason to create sites I'm still embroiled > > in my Catalyst/Mason site and currently toying with the idea of using > > HTML::Widget to do the forms ... so nothing in particular is running, > > yet! > > Strong suggestion: Avoid HTML::Widget. As in, flee. > > I spent a while beating on it and became increasingly sad. > Rose::HTML::Form has made me much happier. The quality of the > documentation and the pleasant demeanor of the author led me rapidly > to evalute Rose::DB too, where I was also pleased.
Thanks for the pointer. I will have to look at that too. You are now the second person to say look at Rose::... instead of HTML::Widget. What in HTML::Widget made you sad? Cheers Alex. ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
