Jeffery Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hasn't anyone wanted masqed packets to retain the origin port before?
> There's got to be a way to do this.
If the packets retained the original port numbers, they wouldn't be
masqueraded packets, would they!? Masq traffic is always in the
61000-65096 range. That's how the masq box recognizes that it's masq
traffic and needs to be de-masqueraded.
Why didn't udpredir do what you wanted? I thought that was how you
solved this problem.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Nothing takes the taste out of peanut
sometimes known as David DeSimone || butter quite like unrequited love."
http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ || -- Charlie Brown
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
