/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */
>I have recently upgraded several network gateway machines to various
>versions of the 2.2.x kernel (where x=6, 7, and 10). I was previously
>running 2.0.34 which I compiled to include support for IP Masquerading,
>and this setup worked very well. I used ipfwadmin to initialize the
>masquerading.
Steve,
Have you received any responses on this one?
1. Ok, are ALL of the above mentioned machines acting as MASQ servers?
Is one kernel version better than another? Are you running
the newest IPCHAINS and NET-UTILs code?
2. When MASQ seems to break, can an internal machine telnet to the
MASQ server itself?
3. If you can still get to the MASQ server, can you then do various
tests like PINGs, etc to the Internet?
--David
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
!---- ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
