/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */
>> 1. Ok, are ALL of the above mentioned machines acting as MASQ servers?
>> Is one kernel version better than another? Are you running
>> the newest IPCHAINS and NET-UTILs code?
>
>i have tried it on two separate machines (two separate physical networks:
>at home and at work), and have upgraded kernels several times on each
>machine.
Kernels aren't everything. Be SURE you have a modern IPCHAINS and
Net-Utils package. Things move about..
>i can ping/telnet the masq server from internal machines, and can access
>the internet from the masq server. i cannot access the internet directly
>from internal machines.
What does a "ipchains -l -m" show?
>i actually ended up solving this problem by adding a second network card
>to the masq server (and not using IP aliasing anymore). though it works
>now, i do not consider this to be an `adequate' fix.
Oh.. so you had both networks running on ONE nic? I agree this isn't
a fix but using ONE nic is a bad idea.
--David
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
!---- ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
