I wrote: > >Shouldn't that be port range 6000:6007 for Xwindows? And David A. Ranch replied: > Well.. yes and no. X starts at port 6000 and works its > way up if 6000 is busy. I haven't seen X get through > when 6000 is blocked. Have you? Yes, I have. When I asked about it on a different list, I was recommended to block 6000:6007 since then I've never seen a problem. The explanation was that some (not all) recent Xservers listen on 6000:6007. (I don't remember which of the commercial servers I was trying out at the time.) Lourdes --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] [masq] Limitation problem.... Charles Shoemaker
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Marc Cassuto
- [masq] How a firewall works... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... Fred Viles
- Re: [masq] [masq] How a firewall ... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works..... Lourdes A Jones
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works..... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] [masq] How a firewall ... Lourdes A Jones
- Re: [masq] [masq] How a firewall ... Michael Casteel
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works..... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] How a fi... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works..... Lourdes A Jones
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Lourdes A Jones
- [masq] Interesting Loop back.... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Interesting Loop back.... Ovidiu Motz
- Re: [masq] Interesting Loop back.... David A. Ranch
- [Masq] Re: [masq] Interesting Loo... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Fuzzy Fox