didnt I post this before? http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/09/the-47-billion-network-thats-already-obsolete/492764/
the Atlantic says that the narrative about 9/11 is wrong - they say that the actual problem was that the FD repeaters failed WRONG It kinda sad when a magazine like the Atlantic tries to clean up a historical inaccuracy by spewing more historical inaccuracies the FD repeater on 9/11 did not fail - the chief in the lobby just couldnt get the radio/telephone handset in the lobby to work is this a distinction without a difference? - not at all - the repeater (154.43R) would have worked just fine if anyone in the lobby had tried to use a portable radio on the repeater - but they were just not radio savvy enough to try that also - why does it say that 9/11 was 4 years ago in the title? do they mean 15 years ago? does someone think that 9/11 is 9/2011? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/massfire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
