2016 info about Amador Plan in Madera County

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Peter Szerlagi <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://www.statter911.com/2018/05/13/city-defends-2-on-engines-after-state-safety-violation-over-rescue-at-house-fire/
>
> Is it really necessary to have all this hubabaloo over something that
> will happen once every 10 years; while thousands of people die and
> suffer needlessly due to lousy EMS every week?
>
> next closest stations were 2.5 and 3 miles away - maybe via 60 MPH
> roads - 
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lNCTEASPwgKiGymlVp8-g8gjkJwAV-Pc&usp=sharing
>
> what was the call taking time? what was the que time? what was the
> resource allocation decision time? what was the alerting time? what
> was the chute time? was Green wave used? what were the EMS and cops
> and dpw and ups guys doing? how much fire prevention work is done in
> Camas?
>
> how much of a delay happened in reporting the fire because people dont
> want to deal with all the government and media agencies?
>
> Keep in mind that there are 2 man engine companies all over California
> in the rural areas - probably hundreds of them - all the Amador Plan
> engines (winter engines from CalFire) for example - plus many rural
> FDs
>
> this notion that an engine MUST have 3 or 4 people is really silly -
> where does it come from? - where is the proof that 3 or 4 man engines
> are better than 2 man engines?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"massfire" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/massfire.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to