Ian Thomas wrote:
> Chris Barker wrote:
>> I think it would be great to have in MPL.
>>
>> What code are you using for the triangulation? Does it do constrained
>> delauney?
> 
> My code only does the contouring; you have to input the triangulation.
>  In the examples included with the code I used matplotlib.delaunay to
> do the triangulations so as not to reinvent the wheel.
> 
> To include it in MPL, I would need to improve it somewhat (there are a
> couple of known bugs and insufficient documentation) and there would
> need to be a discussion of the API.  At the moment I am using
> 
>     tricontour(x, y, triangulation_indices, z, optional_mask)
> 
> followed by the usual contour args (N or V) and kwargs.  Is this OK?
> I've also written utility plotting functions triplot, trifill and
> tripcolor; are these wanted?
> 
> In terms of implementation, at the python level I have a TriContourSet
> class which is the same as the existing ContourSet apart from a few
> lines that deal with input arguments and calling the appropriate
> underlying C++ code.  Ideally it would be sensible to refactor the
> common python code into a new class (BaseContourSet?) and have
> relatively thin derived ContourSet and TriContourSet classes.  But I'm
> not sure you'd like a relatively new mpl contributor to change such
> important code...

Ian,

As the person who fixed major bugs in cntr.c, you have wizard status, so 
go ahead!  I have no objection to some refactoring, so long as 
everything works in the end, and is no more difficult to read and 
maintain than what is there now--which I am sure could be improved even 
without the Tri additions.

What sort of timeline do you have in mind?

One possibility would be to develop the tri* functionality at least 
initially as a module in lib/mpl_toolkits, like axes_grid and mplot3d; 
or in a module in lib/matplotlib.  This could still take advantage of 
refactoring in contour.py.  An advantage is that it would consolidate 
the triangle functionality so it would be easier to find, track, and 
document.

I copied this reply to the devel list--let's continue there as needed.

Eric

> 
> Ian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to