1. I’m not sure I understand what you mean by “wind power input is moving freely”. Normally, the wind power output is dispatched by MOST. If the cost of the wind generation is sufficiently low, and the network supports it, the wind units will typically be dispatched at their PMAX values as specified by the wind profile. What exactly are you seeing?
2. Certainly. All of the output data is stored in the mdo returned by most(). In particular, see Tables 5-10 and 5-13 in the MOST User’s Manual <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MOST-manual-1.0.1.pdf>. You can find the UC status for generator i in period t in mdo.UC.CommitSched(i, t) and the dispatch in mdo.flow(t, j, k).mpc.gen(i, PG). Ray > On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:27 AM, Carlos Ferrandon Cervantes > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Doctors: > > > I am running a unit commitment simulation for the 24 bus reliability test > system, for a time horizon of 24 hours with an hourly time step. > > Problem 1: The wind power input from time series data is not following the > specified pattern. To fix this, I've tried following the "most_ex6_uc" > example in MOST. I've added the wind data as in the example > "ex_wind_profile_uc". I am certain that in the "wind.xgd_table.data" file the > wind power input is marked with the number 2 for a "CommitKey" value. I've > removed the wind input from the mpc data, specifically on "mpc.gen", > "mpc.gencost" and "mpc.reserves", since only using "add_wind" and > "get_profiles" is enough; according to the example. > > Nevertheless, I realise that the wind power input is moving freely through > each one of the time steps, whereas in the "most_ex6_uc" example this is not > the case. I would like my case to follow the hourly wind pattern during 24hrs > just like in the example. > > I will be very helpful if you could explain to me why this is happening and > how to solve it. > > Problem 2: Is it possible to use the final output data of UC? Save it and use > it next with different constraints added to a second UC problem? I am > interested in saving the data of certain power output of some units after the > simulation is performed. I would like to know how would you approach this. > > As always, thank you very much in advance, your input has been widely helpful, > > best wishes, > > -- > Carlos Ferrandon
